首页> 外文OA文献 >Moderation of effects of AAC based on setting and types of aided AAC on outcome variables: An aggregate study of single-case research with individuals with ASD
【2h】

Moderation of effects of AAC based on setting and types of aided AAC on outcome variables: An aggregate study of single-case research with individuals with ASD

机译:基于辅助AAC的设置和类型对结果变量的AAC影响的调节:与ASD个体的单例研究的汇总研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the potential moderating effects of intervention setting and type of aided AAC on outcome variables for students with autism spectrum disorders. Methods: Improvement Rate Difference, an effect size measure, was used to calculate aggregate effects across 35 single case research studies. Results: Results indicated that the largest effects for aided AAC were observed in general education settings. With respect to communication outcomes, both speech generating devices and the Picture Exchange Communication System were associated with larger effects than other picture-based systems. With respect to challenging behaviour outcomes, SGDs produced larger effects than PECS.Conclusion: This aggregate study highlights the importance of considering intervention setting, choice of AAC system, and target outcomes when designing and planning an aided AAC intervention.
机译:目的:本荟萃分析的目的是评估自闭症谱系障碍学生干预设置和辅助AAC类型对结局变量的潜在调节作用。方法:采用改善率差异(一种效果量度)来计算35个单例研究的总体效果。结果:结果表明,在普通教育环境中,辅助AAC的效果最大。关于通信结果,语音生成设备和图片交换通信系统都比其他基于图片的系统具有更大的效果。就具有挑战性的行为结果而言,SGD产生的影响要大于PECS。结论:这项总体研究突显了在设计和计划辅助性AAC干预时考虑干预设置,AAC系统选择和目标结果的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号